Justification of Training Conditions Aimed at the Development of Muscle Hypertrophy During the Fitness Training

Authors

  • Lyubov Erakova National University of Ukraine on Physical Education and Sport
  • Alexander Dovgich National University of Ukraine on Physical Education and Sport
  • Ruslan National University of Ukraine on Physical Education and Sport

Keywords:

muscle hypertrophy, physical activity, power fitness, intensity, training frequency

Abstract

The article deals with the formation of muscle hypertrophy problem during physical activity with weight (power fitness). Based on materials of special methodological literature and content-analysis of scientific supplies in the MEDLINE and Google Scholar databases it is shown that training for muscle development and achievement of the desired shape muscles (hypertrophy) have almost no methodological or any other differences. Also it is found out that the programs that lead to the increasing of the strength also cause a certain increase in a muscle mass but the extent of such increments can vary significantly depending on the characteristics of physical activity – training frequency, the value of weight and the volume of the work force. The presented results allowed to differentiate the power loads in fitness with mentioned characteristics. It is rationally to appropriate three force training conditions in fitness, the combination of which in the development of strength and hypertrophy makes the process the most effective. 

References

1. Abe T. Skeletal muscle size and circulating IGF-1 are increased after two weeks of twice daily Kaatsu resistance training [online] / T. Abe, T. Yasuda, T. Midorikawa [et al] // Int. J. Kaatsu Training Res. – 2005. – Vol. 1. – P. 7–14.
2. Ahtiainen J. P. Muscle hypertrophy,hormonal adaptations and strength development during strength training in strength-trained and untrained men / J. P. Ahtiainen, A. Pakarinen, M. Alen [et al.] // Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. – 2003. – Vol. 89. – P. 555–563.
3. Akima H. Inactivity and muscle: effect of resistance training during bed rest on muscle size in the lower limb / H. Akima, K. Kubo, M. Imai [et al.] // Acta Physiol. Scand. – 2001. – Vol. 172. – P. 269–278.
4. Atha J. Strengthening muscle/ J. Atha // Exerc. Sports Sci. Rev. – 1981. – Vol. 9. – P. 1–73.
5. Brandenburg J. P. The effects of accentuated eccentric loading on strength, muscle hypertrophy and neural adaptations in trained individuals / J. P. Brandenburg, D. Docherty // J. Strength Cond. Res. – 2002. – Vol. 16. – P. 25–32.
6. Chesley A. Changes in human muscle protein synthesis after resistance exercise / A. Chesley, J. D. MacDougall, M. A. Tarnopolsky // J. Appl. Physiol. – 1992. – Vol. 7. – P. 1383–1388.
7. Choi J. The difference between effects of 'power-up type’ and ’bulk-up type’ strength training exercises: with special reference to muscle cross-sectional area, muscular strength, anaerobic power and anaerobic endurance / J. Choi, H. Takahashi, Y. Itai [et al.] //Jpn. J. Phys. Fitness Sports Med. – 1998. – Vol. 47 (1). – P. 119–129.
8. Friedmann B. Muscular adaptations to computer-guided strength training with eccentric overload / B. Friedmann, R. Kinscherf, S. Vorwald [et al.] //Acta Physiol. Scand. – 2004. – Vol. 182. – P. 77–88.
9. Hakkinen K. Neuromuscular adaptation during strength training, aging, detraining, and immobilization / K. Hakkinen // Crit. Rev. Phys. Rehab. Med. – 1994. – Vol. 6. – P. 161–198.
10. Hakkinen K. Distribution of strength training volume into one or two daily sessions and neuromuscular adaptations in female athletes / K. Hakkinen, M. Kallinen // Electromyogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. – 1994. – Vol. 34. – P. 117–124.
11. Hawkins S. A. Eccentric muscle action increases site-specific osteogenic response / S. A. Hawkins, E. T. Schroeder, R. A. Wiswell [et al.] // Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. – 1999. – Vol. 31. – P. 1287–1292.
12. Kraemer W. J. American College of Sports Medicine Position Stand: progression models in resis¬tance training for healthy adults / W. J. Kraemer, K. Adams, E. Cafarelli [et al.] // Med. Sci. Sports.Exerc. – 2002. – Vol. 34. – P. 364–380.
13. Kraemer W. J. Fundamentals of resistance training: progression and exercise prescription / W. J. Kraemer, N. A. Ratamess // Med. Sci. Sports. Exerc. – 2004. – Vol. 36. – P. 674–688.
14. Masuda K. Maintenance of myoglobin concentration in human skeletal muscle after heavy resistance training / K. Masuda, J. Y. Choi, H. Shimojo [et al.] // Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. – 1999. – Vol. 79. – P. 347–352.
15. McBride J. M. Effect of resistance exercise volume and complexity on EMG, strength, and regional body composition / J. M. McBride, J. B. Blaak, T. Triplett-McBride // Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. – 2003. – Vol. 90. – P. 626–632.
16. Narici M. V. Hypertrophic response of human skeletal muscle to strength training in hypoxia and normoxia / M. V. Narici, B. Kayser // Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. – 1995. – Vol. 70. – P. 213–219.
17. Narici M. V. Hypertrophic response of human skeletal muscle to strength training in hypoxia and normoxia / M. V. Narici, B. Kayser // Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. – 1995. – Vol. 70. – P. 213–219.
18. Okada J. Effects of resistance training associated with stretch-shortening cycle exercise on force development and muscle volume in human elbow flexors / J. Okada, S. Fukashiro // Adv. Exerc. Sports. Physiol. – 2001. – Vol. 7. – P. 65–71.
19. Ostrowski K. The effect of weight training volume on hormonal output and muscular size and function / K. Ostrowski, G. J. Wilson, R. Weatherby [et al.] // J. Strength Cond. Res. – 1997. – Vol. 11. – P. 148–154.
20. Peterson M. D. Maximizing strength development in athletes: a meta-analysis to determine the dose-response relationship / M. D. Peterson, M. R. Rhea, B. A. Alvar // J. Strength Cond. Res. – 2004. – Vol. 18. – P. 377–382.
21. Poliquin C. Five steps to increasing the effectiveness of your strength training program / C. Poliquin // Natl. Strength Cond. Assoc. J. – 1988. – Vol. 10. – P. 34–39.
22. Pollock M. L. Muscular hypertrophy responses to 6 months of high or low volume resistance training [abstract] / M. L. Pollock, T. Abe, D. V. DeHoyos [et al.] // Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. – 1998. Vol. 30 (5 Suppl.). – P. S116.
23. Rhea M. R. A meta-analysis of periodized versus nonperiodized strength and power training programs / M. R. Rhea, B. L. Alderman // Res. Q.Exerc. Sport. – 2004. – Vol. 75. – P. 413–422.
24. Rhea M. R. Single versus multiple sets for strength: a meta-analysis to address the controversy / M. R. Rhea, B. A. Alvar, L. N. Burkett // Res. Q.Exerc. Sport. – 2002. – Vol. 73. – P. 485–488.
25. Rhea M. R. A meta-analysis to determine the dose response for strength development / M. R. Rhea, В. A. Alvar, L. N. Burkett [et al.] // Med. Sci. Sports.Exerc. – 2003. – Vol. 35. – P. 456–464.
26. Rose A. J. Exercise rapidly increases eukaryotic elongation factor 2 phosphorylation in skeletal muscle of men / A. J. Rose, C. Broholm, K. Kiillerich, S. G. Finn [et al.] // J. Physiol. – 2005. – Vol. 5696. – P. 223–228.
27. Sale D.. Effect of low vs high repetition weight training upon strength, muscle size and muscle fiber size [abstract] / D. Sale, D. MacDougall, S. Alway [et al.] // Can. J. Spt. Sci. – 1985. – Vol. 10 (4). – 27P.
28. Schmidtbleicher D. Neuronal adaptation and increase of cross-sectional area studying different strength training methods / D. Schmidtbleicher, M. Buehrle // In: Jonsson GB, editor. Biomechanics X-B, volume 6-B. Champaign (IL): Human Kinetics. – 198. – P. 615–620.
29. Seynnes O. R. Early skeletal muscle hypertrophy and architectural changes in response to high-intensity resistance training / O. R. Seynnes, M. de Boer, M. V. Narici // J. Appl. Physiol. – Epub, 2006. – Oct. 19.
30. Starkey D. B. Effect of resistance training volume on strength and muscle thickness / D. B. Starkey, M. L. Pollock, Y. Ishida [et al.] // Med. Sci. Sports Exerc.– 1996. – Vol. 28. – P. 1311–1320.
31. Stone M. H. Weight training: a scientific approach / M. H. Stone, H. S. O’Bryant. – Minneapolis (MI) : Bellweather press, 1987.
32. Takarada Y. Effects of resistance exercise combined with vascular occlusion on muscle function in ath-letes / Y. Takarada, Y. Sato, N. Ishii // Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. – 2002. – Vol. 86. – P. 308–314.
33. Vikne H. Muscular performance after concentric and eccentric exercise in trained men / H. Vikne, P. E. Refsnes, M. Ekmark [et al.] // Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. – 2006. – Vol. 38. – P. 1770–1881.
34. Vikne H. Effect of training frequency of maximum eccentric strength training on muscle force and cross-sectional area in strength-trained athletes [abstract no. RR-PL-0517] / H. Vikne, P. E. Refsnes, J. I. Medbo // In: Book of abstracts, 14 th International WCPT Congress. – 2003. – June 7–12. – Barcelona, 2003.
35. Wirth K. Changes in muscle mass detected by MRI, after an eight week hypertrophy training program / K. Wirth, K. R. Atzor, D. Schmidtbleicher // In: Koskolou M, editor. Proceedings of 7th annual Congress of the European College of Sports Sciences. – 2002. – Jul. 24–27. – Athens. – 103.
36. Wolfe B. L. Quantitative analysis of single- vs multiple-set programs in resistance training / B. L. Wolfe, L. M. LeMura, P. J. Cole // J. Strength Cond. Res. – 2004. – Vol. 18. – P. 35–47.

Published

2020-01-14

Issue

Section

Historical, Philosophical, Legal and Organizational Problems of Physical Trainin

How to Cite

Justification of Training Conditions Aimed at the Development of Muscle Hypertrophy During the Fitness Training. (2020). Youth Scientific Journal Lesya Ukrainka Eastern European National University, 15, 10-15. https://sportvisnyk.vnu.edu.ua/index.php/sportvisnyk/article/view/527