Static-Dynamic Posture – the Indicator of the Human Motor Function

Authors

  • Vitaliy Kashuba National University of Ukraine on Physical Education and Sport https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6669-738X
  • Tamara Khabinets National University of Ukraine on Physical Education and Sport
  • Serhiy Lopatskyi Ivano-Frankivsk National Medical University
  • Herman Hnatysh National University of Ukraine on Physical Education and Sport

Keywords:

physical education, static-dynamic bearing, biomechanics of walking, schoolchildren

Abstract

The article deals with the issue of the state of the junior schoolchildren’s static-dynamic posture in the process of physical exercises practicing. The static-dynamic posture is characterized by the body’s vertical position in equilibrium and change in the dynamic posture, and the body’s position over time. In this case, the human body’s vertical position from the system positions is evaluated as a certain harmony of the interrelated spatial characteristics of the body. As the result of the experiment, we found out that the posture’s infraction could significantly affect the spatial organization of the primary school aged children’s body. For the first time we determined that children with disorders of the body’s spatial organization reduced the velocity of the mass center of the lower extremities and the common center of the body’s mass when performing natural locomotion. The consequence of the reduced speed indicators of the general center of the body’s mass in children with disorders of the body’s spatial organization is an increase in duration of separate phases of a double step walk. The duration of the double step walk of children with functional disorders of the musculoskeletal system increased by an average of 0,3 second. This, of course, affected the tempo-rhythmic step structure – this children’s group was unable to repeat a given metronome tempo walk. They defined that the step length on the right and left legs of children with disorders of the body’s spatial organization on average by 0,56 m, and children with disabilities  0,45 m, the distance between the toe and heel shock support feet at first is an average of 0,27 m and the second – 0,25 m. The obtained data can be a reference point of the state of schoolchildren’s motor function while organizing the process of physical education. The records of these indicators will contribute to prevention of functional disorders of the musculoskeletal system and improve the locomotor function.

References

1. Bernshteyn, N., Osipov, L., & Pavlenko, P. (1940). Issledovanie po biodinamike hodby, bega, pryzhka [Research on the biodynamics of walking, running, jumping]. Moscow: Meditsina. (in Russian).
2. Kashuba, V., Sergienko, K., & Honcharova, N. (2006). Proektuvannya systemy monitorynhu fizychnoho stanu shkolyariv na osnovi vykorystannya informaciynykh tekhnolohiy [Designing a system for monitoring the physical condition of schoolchildren based on the use of information technology]. Teoriya i metodika fizichnogo vihovannya i sportu [Theory and methods of physical education and sport], 3, 61–67. (in Ukrainian).
3. Kashuba, V. (2003). Biomekhanika osanky [Posture biomechanics]. Kyiv: Olimpiyskaya literatura. (in Ukrainian).
4. Kashuba, V., & Adel, B. (2005). Profilaktika i korrekciya narushenij prostranstvennoj organizacii tela cheloveka v processe fizicheskogo vospitaniya [Prevention and correction of violations of the spatial organization of the human body in the process of physical education]. Kyiv: Znaniya Ukrainy. (in Russian).
5. Kashuba, V., Adel, B., & Khabinets, T. (2006). Kinematicheskij analiz estestvennoj lokomocii mladshih shkolnikov s narusheniyami morfobiomehanicheskih svojstv stopy [Kinematic analysis of the natural locomotion of junior students with impaired morphobiomechanical properties of the foot]. Moloda sportyvna nauka Ukrainy [Young sports science of Ukraine], 10, 32–35. (in Russian).
6. Kashuba, V., Ivchatova, T., & Serhienko, K. (2014). Tehnologiya izmereniya prostranstvennoj organizacii tela cheloveka v processe zanyatij fizicheskimi uprazhneniyami [The technology of measuring the spatial organization of the human body during exercise]. Almaty: KazAST. (in Russian).
7. Kashuba, V., Ivchatova, & Sergienko, K. (2014). K voprosu izmereniya prostranstvennoj organizacii tela cheloveka v processe fizicheskogo vospitaniya s ispolzovaniem kompyuternyh tehnologij [On the issue of measuring the spatial organization of the human body in the process of physical education using computer technology]. Sportyvnyi visnyk Prydniprovya [Sports newsletter of Prydniprovya], 1, 42–45. (in Russian).
8. Kashuba, V. (2015). Monitoring sostoyaniya prostranstvennoj organizacii tela cheloveka v processe fizicheskogo vospitaniya [Monitoring the state of the spatial organization of the human body in the process of physical education]. Teoriya i metodika fizichnogo vihovannya i sportu [Theory and methods of physical education and sport], 2, 53–64. (in Russian).
9. Kashuba, V. (2015). Organizacionno-metodicheskie osnovy monitoringa prostranstvennoj organizacii tela cheloveka v processe fizicheskogo vospitaniya [Organizational and methodological foundations of monitoring the spatial organization of the human body in the process of physical education]. NAUKA I SPORT: sovremennye tendencii [SCIENCE AND SPORT: current trends], 8.3, 75–90. (in Russian).
10. Laputin, A., & Kashuba, V. (1999). Formirovanie massy i gravitacionnye vzaimodejstviya tela cheloveka v processe ontogeneza [Formation of mass and gravitational interactions of the human body in the process of ontogenesis]. Znaniya Ukrainy. (in Russian).
11. Laputin, A., Kashuba, V., & Khabinets, T. (2005). Kinetyka yak systema znan pro rukhovu funktsiyu lyudyny [Kinetics as a system of knowledge of the human motor function]. Teoriya i metodyka fizychnoho vykhovannya i sportu [Theory and methods of physical education and sport], 2–3, 96–101. (in Ukrainian).
12. Kashuba, V. (2016). Formirovanie motoriki cheloveka v processe ontogeneza [Formation of human motor skills in the process of ontogenesis]. Lutsk: Vezha-Druk. (in Russian).
13. Nosova, N., & Dudko, M. (2015). Ocenka sostoyaniya osanki studentov v processe fizicheskogo vospitaniya na osnove vizualnogo skrininga [Assessment of the posture of students in the process of physical education on the basis of visual screening]. Sportyvna nauka Ukrainy [Sports Science of Ukraine], 67, 3, 30–35. (in Russian).
14. Laputin, A., Gamaliy, V., Arhipov, A., Kashuba, V., Nosko, N., & Khabinets, T. (2000). Prakticheskaya biomehanika [Practical biomechanics]. Kyiv: Znannya. (in Russian).
15. Sergienko, K. (2003). Kontrol i profilaktika narushenij oporno-ressornoj funkcii stopy shkolnikov v processe fizicheskogo vospitaniya [Control and prevention of violations of the support-spring function of the foot of schoolchildren in the process of physical education]. Kyiv. (in Russian).

Published

2018-02-28

Issue

Section

Historical, Philosophical, Legal and Organizational Problems of Physical Trainin

How to Cite

Static-Dynamic Posture – the Indicator of the Human Motor Function. (2018). Youth Scientific Journal Lesya Ukrainka Eastern European National University, 29, 9-14. https://sportvisnyk.vnu.edu.ua/index.php/sportvisnyk/article/view/54